![latex mac word processor latex mac word processor](https://miro.medium.com/max/256/1*tfcArAt3u0-cubwtFm38nQ.png)
Then the students had to fall back on one of their backups. In addition, it happened quite often that large documents get somehow corrupted and it wasn't possible to edit/open it again.Almost every student was complaining about mysterious behaviour like disappearing pictures or lost formatting.Since I am not a geek I think that I can give roughly an average opinion. I just want to add some general comments. Most of the points are already mentioned in the very good other answers. Therefore I experienced both the typical Word and LaTeX workflow. I am currently studying for a PhD (engineering, almost done) and I supervised some student projects (diploma thesis and so on). Layout changes are difficult (i.e., will require time for you to hunt down solution and implement it).Many features require libraries, which you have to find/be made aware of (view changes, etc).Collaborators unfamiliar with LaTeX will have difficulty reviewing your manuscripts.Once learned, much faster and more intuitive (e.g., \label and \ref for referencing, as opposed to Word's fairly kludgy "Cross-referencing" window which requires way too many clicks to insert a single reference).Produces aesthetically beautiful documents.Just put the words down there and you're golden You don't have to worry about layout, it's all automatic.It's just text anyone can edit your file.Included bibliography editor is virtually unusable for most scientific writing you'll need to buy a third-party solution to manage your bibliography.Math is difficult, slow, and often ugly.Layout can be a real bear to get correct.Easy-to-use reviewing tools (view changes, add comments, etc).
Latex mac word processor install#
Latex mac word processor how to#
Sure, it may be tedious to fix the formatting later on, compared to LaTeX where one need to first figure out how to setup a bare-minimum file before using, it may be an attractive point. If you just care about getting the ideas down on paper, you can use a WYSIWYG editor just like a typewriter. Unless you work in mathematics, computer science, or physics (and sometimes even if you work in those fields), it is more likely that your collaborators will know what to do with a Word or Writer file than a LaTeX file. But this is generally conveniently built into WYSIWYG editors. Admittedly most text editors one uses to edit TeX files also do spell check. When a large number of authors are commenting on the writing of one file, this can be very useful. Word and Writer have very good comments/annotations and edit-tracking features. Without using an online site for collaborative LaTeX editing (such as ShareLaTeX), working collaboratively on a LaTeX file ideally requires some sort of separate revision control software. WYSIWYG (especially Word and Writer) is better at: And I've found LaTeX to be better at preparing complex tables. With PSTricks or TikZ, one can produce high quality illustrations within the document (though the learning curve is a bit steep there). Furthermore recent versions of Word and LibreOffice Writer, when properly used, should be able to keep track of various levels of section heading separate from the body text, and apply uniform styling to each level. In practice some of the journal publishers demand special formatting commands that partially moots this process. In principle this means that you can write your document without caring how it is formatted, and at the end of the day wrap it in the style-file provided by the journal publisher before submission to conform to the house style. This is never a problem with BibTeX or LaTeX. As of a couple of years ago the major WYSIWYG editors still had problems with re-numbering cross-references and bibliography items. Consistent handling of intra-document references and bibliography.Layout and entry are generally easier using LaTeX than some other sort of equation editor.